Reality Remixed: Like Disco Lemonade
What better place than here?
What better time than now?


Monday, October 29, 2001
Has anyone tried the new "Code Red" Mountain Dew? Opinions? Personally, I'm a little amused by it -- they're following the color trends set by most cough syrups, with NyQuil definitely leading the pack in terms of recognition on that. Denis Leary and Lewis Black have both done routines on NyQuil, and both mentioned the color schemes. Lewis was the one who called out the fact that NyQuil does have the same colors as Christmas ("That's right, folks, NyQuil makes a dandy eggnog!") and it seems that the Dew seems to be following suit. So either PepsiCo is planning on a nice Christmas marketing campaign this year, or they're planning on breaking into the pharmaceutical field. Then again, with the amount of caffeine Mountain Dew has in it, it already has the grounds to be classified as a DayQuil-like stimulant.

I can see the ads already: "Mountain Dew -- now with cough suppressant! It's the coughing, hacking, lethargic, barely awake in the morning, pulling-an-allnighter, so you can bounce off the walls and get your work on medicine and soft drink! In regular radioactive-goo green and 'Code Red' Christmas colors/flavors."
Posted by Keith @ 06:11 PM ·
Has anyone tried the new "Code Red" Mountain Dew? Opinions? Personally, I'm a little amused by it -- they're following the color trends set by most cough syrups, with NyQuil definitely leading the pack in terms of recognition on that. Denis Leary and Lewis Black have both done routines on NyQuil, and both mentioned the color schemes. Lewis was the one who called out the fact that NyQuil does have the same colors as Christmas ("That's right, folks, NyQuil makes a dandy eggnog!") and it seems that the Dew seems to be following suit. So either PepsiCo is planning on a nice Christmas marketing campaign this year, or they're planning on breaking into the pharmaceutical field. Then again, with the amount of caffeine Mountain Dew has in it, it already has the grounds to be classified as a DayQuil-like stimulant.

I can see the ads already: "Mountain Dew -- now with cough suppressant! It's the coughing, hacking, lethargic, barely awake in the morning, pulling-an-allnighter, so you can bounce off the walls and get your work on medicine and soft drink! In regular radioactive-goo green and 'Code Red' Christmas colors/flavors."
Posted by Keith @ 06:11 PM ·
I was going to write about the abject stupidity and duality of George W. Moron's statement of "flee for the hills to avoid the terrorists, yet live your lives normally," but Michele beat me to it. Instead, let's turn our attention to the Business section of the paper, shall we?

United Airlines (who I refuse to fly anymore because every time I fly United, they either delay my flight a long while or route me through Chicago even when I'm not going anywhere near it) canned their chairman, James Goodwin, because he said last week that the company would "perish sometime next year" unless they took actions to cut costs. The company's other directors forced him out and replaced him with board member John Creighton.

Okay, can we take a look at how dumb that was? The man gave a warning -- he said, "Unless we cut costs, we're not going to make it." And they canned him for it. Personally, I think that was a really wise thing to say because it showed that he recognizes the problems facing the company. That's the kind of leadership that I'm looking for in the White House. Recognition is the first step towards solving the problem. Shooting the messenger is the first step towards burying your head in the sand.

The thing that I don't get is that George W. Moron hasn't really done anything since the 9/11 attacks. He's made all sorts of vague statements about how we need to "stand firm and united" and "not give in," but if you break it down to the nitty-gritty, he's really made no definitive points at all. He's the idiot full of sound & fury, yet signifying nothing. All he's really done is send the military over to Afghanistan, and they're not even being that effective considering that we've been bombing for a couple weeks now and all we've succeeded in doing is blowing up sand. We still haven't caught Bin Laden. The Taliban are still firmly entrenched over there. And despite this, Moron's approval rating is through the roof. So how come a guy who has the chutzpah to stand up and say, "Hey, our company has a problem and here's a path we can take to try to keep ourselves afloat" -- how come he's the one who gets canned?

The irony of the situation is that this new guy, Creighton, said basically the same thing as Goodwin did when he announced that he would attempt to "sort out" United's financial problems. Apparently, though, he said it with a little more sugar-coating, so that's okay. But I'd rather have a guy stand up and rain fire & brimstone, because sometimes that's the only way to galvanize people and to make them realize that everything's not all right. If you sugar-coat things too much, people will get a false sense of security, which makes things worse for them when the bottom falls out a few months or years down the road.
Posted by Keith @ 06:10 PM ·
I was going to write about the abject stupidity and duality of George W. Moron's statement of "flee for the hills to avoid the terrorists, yet live your lives normally," but Michele beat me to it. Instead, let's turn our attention to the Business section of the paper, shall we?

United Airlines (who I refuse to fly anymore because every time I fly United, they either delay my flight a long while or route me through Chicago even when I'm not going anywhere near it) canned their chairman, James Goodwin, because he said last week that the company would "perish sometime next year" unless they took actions to cut costs. The company's other directors forced him out and replaced him with board member John Creighton.

Okay, can we take a look at how dumb that was? The man gave a warning -- he said, "Unless we cut costs, we're not going to make it." And they canned him for it. Personally, I think that was a really wise thing to say because it showed that he recognizes the problems facing the company. That's the kind of leadership that I'm looking for in the White House. Recognition is the first step towards solving the problem. Shooting the messenger is the first step towards burying your head in the sand.

The thing that I don't get is that George W. Moron hasn't really done anything since the 9/11 attacks. He's made all sorts of vague statements about how we need to "stand firm and united" and "not give in," but if you break it down to the nitty-gritty, he's really made no definitive points at all. He's the idiot full of sound & fury, yet signifying nothing. All he's really done is send the military over to Afghanistan, and they're not even being that effective considering that we've been bombing for a couple weeks now and all we've succeeded in doing is blowing up sand. We still haven't caught Bin Laden. The Taliban are still firmly entrenched over there. And despite this, Moron's approval rating is through the roof. So how come a guy who has the chutzpah to stand up and say, "Hey, our company has a problem and here's a path we can take to try to keep ourselves afloat" -- how come he's the one who gets canned?

The irony of the situation is that this new guy, Creighton, said basically the same thing as Goodwin did when he announced that he would attempt to "sort out" United's financial problems. Apparently, though, he said it with a little more sugar-coating, so that's okay. But I'd rather have a guy stand up and rain fire & brimstone, because sometimes that's the only way to galvanize people and to make them realize that everything's not all right. If you sugar-coat things too much, people will get a false sense of security, which makes things worse for them when the bottom falls out a few months or years down the road.
Posted by Keith @ 06:10 PM ·
I'm becoming more and more fond of Herd of Sheep, which is kind of a stripped-down (yet still hilarious) British version of The Onion.

A sample from the latest update: "One month after hijacked planes attacked Lower Manhattan, New York Mayor Rudolph Giuliani spoke out against the epidemic of niceness in the city. He urged New Yorkers to defy the terrorists by resuming normal life... Giuliani said it was time for New Yorkers to get back to being New Yorkers. 'Act like pussies, and the fuckers will have won,' he said."
Posted by Keith @ 06:09 PM ·
I'm becoming more and more fond of Herd of Sheep, which is kind of a stripped-down (yet still hilarious) British version of The Onion.

A sample from the latest update: "One month after hijacked planes attacked Lower Manhattan, New York Mayor Rudolph Giuliani spoke out against the epidemic of niceness in the city. He urged New Yorkers to defy the terrorists by resuming normal life... Giuliani said it was time for New Yorkers to get back to being New Yorkers. 'Act like pussies, and the fuckers will have won,' he said."
Posted by Keith @ 06:09 PM ·
Sunday, October 28, 2001
There are some things better left unsaid, some feelings better left unexpressed.

It's evening, you're tired
You sleepwalk --
A robot out on the street
Are you crazy to want this, even for a while?

-- Matthew Good Band, "Strange Days"
Posted by Keith @ 06:07 PM ·
There are some things better left unsaid, some feelings better left unexpressed.

It's evening, you're tired
You sleepwalk --
A robot out on the street
Are you crazy to want this, even for a while?

-- Matthew Good Band, "Strange Days"
Posted by Keith @ 06:07 PM ·
To the woman in the elevator who rode down with me a few hours ago on my way out: how paranoid and/or stupid are you that you would ask me with a serious and worried look on your face whether the envelope I was holding in my hand was an anthrax letter? Are you that brainwashed by the media that any envelopes you see that aren't yours you automatically think are "anthrax letters"? The only reason why I didn't say yes was that I figured anyone dumb enough to ask me that question would probably not be able to tell that I was mocking your lack of intelligence, and would most likely run to the police to tell them someone in the building is sending anthrax letters and get me arrested.
Posted by Keith @ 06:04 PM ·
To the woman in the elevator who rode down with me a few hours ago on my way out: how paranoid and/or stupid are you that you would ask me with a serious and worried look on your face whether the envelope I was holding in my hand was an anthrax letter? Are you that brainwashed by the media that any envelopes you see that aren't yours you automatically think are "anthrax letters"? The only reason why I didn't say yes was that I figured anyone dumb enough to ask me that question would probably not be able to tell that I was mocking your lack of intelligence, and would most likely run to the police to tell them someone in the building is sending anthrax letters and get me arrested.
Posted by Keith @ 06:04 PM ·
NASA's Polar Imaging System captured images of the Aurora Borealis and Aurora Australis from space. After almost three hundred years, they've definitively proved that the auroras are pretty much mirror images of each other. There's also a QuickTime movie on the site of the auroras in motion that looks really cool.
Posted by Keith @ 06:04 PM ·
NASA's Polar Imaging System captured images of the Aurora Borealis and Aurora Australis from space. After almost three hundred years, they've definitively proved that the auroras are pretty much mirror images of each other. There's also a QuickTime movie on the site of the auroras in motion that looks really cool.
Posted by Keith @ 06:04 PM ·
According to the Associated Press, the Pakistani government arrested and gave the U.S. a Yemeni student wanted in connection with the U.S.S. Cole bombing who is also suspected of ties to Al-Qaeda, Osama Bin Laden's terrorist network. The Pakistani government didn't want a fanfare, so they arrested and turned the guy over to U.S. authorities on Thursday without a proper extradition and deportation hearing (translation: they didn't want Bin Laden's network getting word that they were cooperating with the U.S. and therefore make themselves a target as well).

Now, mind you, this is the first person to be arrested in connection with the U.S.S. Cole bombing, which took place a year ago. That's right -- it took a year to catch up to someone for this attack. And while Osama Bin Laden might've been mentioned in connection with the Cole, his name wasn't hammered into our consciousness like it is now. But the thing is, why did it take an entire year to arrest someone in connection with a bombing that destroyed American property and killed American citizens (citizens serving our country, no less!) while within two days of the World Trade Center attacks, we had a name of the prime suspect and within a few weeks, we had a full-scale military response underway?

The Cole was an actual terrorist attack against our country, yet the public response and outrage for that fizzled out very quickly. Maybe because it didn't happen on U.S. soil, maybe because it wasn't against civilians, maybe because it didn't kill on the magnitude of the 9/11 attacks, maybe because it didn't destroy U.S. landmarks. But either way, an attack was made against our country when they attacked the Cole, yet I find it hard to accept the fact that no one had any distinct leads until a year later and people began linking it to the 9/11 attacks.
Posted by Keith @ 06:03 PM ·
According to the Associated Press, the Pakistani government arrested and gave the U.S. a Yemeni student wanted in connection with the U.S.S. Cole bombing who is also suspected of ties to Al-Qaeda, Osama Bin Laden's terrorist network. The Pakistani government didn't want a fanfare, so they arrested and turned the guy over to U.S. authorities on Thursday without a proper extradition and deportation hearing (translation: they didn't want Bin Laden's network getting word that they were cooperating with the U.S. and therefore make themselves a target as well).

Now, mind you, this is the first person to be arrested in connection with the U.S.S. Cole bombing, which took place a year ago. That's right -- it took a year to catch up to someone for this attack. And while Osama Bin Laden might've been mentioned in connection with the Cole, his name wasn't hammered into our consciousness like it is now. But the thing is, why did it take an entire year to arrest someone in connection with a bombing that destroyed American property and killed American citizens (citizens serving our country, no less!) while within two days of the World Trade Center attacks, we had a name of the prime suspect and within a few weeks, we had a full-scale military response underway?

The Cole was an actual terrorist attack against our country, yet the public response and outrage for that fizzled out very quickly. Maybe because it didn't happen on U.S. soil, maybe because it wasn't against civilians, maybe because it didn't kill on the magnitude of the 9/11 attacks, maybe because it didn't destroy U.S. landmarks. But either way, an attack was made against our country when they attacked the Cole, yet I find it hard to accept the fact that no one had any distinct leads until a year later and people began linking it to the 9/11 attacks.
Posted by Keith @ 06:03 PM ·
I am Jack's moral dilemma.

My roommate cooked this huge dinner for him & his girlfriend last night. The dishwasher was mostly full when he started, so he loaded it up with a couple dishes and started a wash around 11PM. Then he went with his girlfriend back to her place, leaving behind a rather messy kitchen with dishes, pots & pans everywhere. I emptied the dishwasher this morning, re-loaded it with some of the stanky stuff that was sitting in the sink all night along with some of the pots & pans, and I'll still have to run another load to get all of his stuff washed. The kitchen is still a mess with spatters & powder everywhere.

Now the question becomes: do I clean up after him because I realize that he has a limited amount of time with his girlfriend because she's working nights this month and he also works and doesn't have a whole lot of time to clean up while I do, or do I leave it be for him to clean up since it was kind of a dick move for him to create a mess and then leave without even a cursory sponging and I shouldn't feel the need to clean up after him since he's 28 and able to do it on his own?
Posted by Keith @ 06:02 PM ·
Page 3 of 4 pages « First  <  1 2 3 4 >