Monday, October 29, 2001
These stories that the ghost-hunters told... man, they kind of weird me out. They say they've talked to ghosts, been physically pushed up against walls and thrown down stairs by ghosts, even had their bodies inhabited by ghosts. Again, I've never seen it with my own eyes and there is definitely no scientific proof for this, but I still find it a little freaky and while I'd like to experience a ghost-sighting to either confirm or deny in my own head the reality of spirits, I kind of wonder if I really want to because I'm a little afraid of what if it is real and what might happen if it is.
According to the article, a man in a tuxedo appears in the upper balcony during shows at the Emerson Majestic Theatre, T drivers ring their trolley bells when driving through the Cedar Grove Cemetery to ward off the spirit of the cemetery's former caretaker, residents at 515 Park Drive occasionally hear a man pounding on their windows and the sounds of a woman struggling (a woman was murdered there by the Boston Strangler on December 31, 1962), and the "Lady in Black" haunts Georges Island in the harbor.
Anyone see any ghosts around?
Posted by Keith @ 06:11 PM ·
I can see the ads already: "Mountain Dew -- now with cough suppressant! It's the coughing, hacking, lethargic, barely awake in the morning, pulling-an-allnighter, so you can bounce off the walls and get your work on medicine and soft drink! In regular radioactive-goo green and 'Code Red' Christmas colors/flavors."
Posted by Keith @ 06:11 PM ·
I can see the ads already: "Mountain Dew -- now with cough suppressant! It's the coughing, hacking, lethargic, barely awake in the morning, pulling-an-allnighter, so you can bounce off the walls and get your work on medicine and soft drink! In regular radioactive-goo green and 'Code Red' Christmas colors/flavors."
Posted by Keith @ 06:11 PM ·
United Airlines (who I refuse to fly anymore because every time I fly United, they either delay my flight a long while or route me through Chicago even when I'm not going anywhere near it) canned their chairman, James Goodwin, because he said last week that the company would "perish sometime next year" unless they took actions to cut costs. The company's other directors forced him out and replaced him with board member John Creighton.
Okay, can we take a look at how dumb that was? The man gave a warning -- he said, "Unless we cut costs, we're not going to make it." And they canned him for it. Personally, I think that was a really wise thing to say because it showed that he recognizes the problems facing the company. That's the kind of leadership that I'm looking for in the White House. Recognition is the first step towards solving the problem. Shooting the messenger is the first step towards burying your head in the sand.
The thing that I don't get is that George W. Moron hasn't really done anything since the 9/11 attacks. He's made all sorts of vague statements about how we need to "stand firm and united" and "not give in," but if you break it down to the nitty-gritty, he's really made no definitive points at all. He's the idiot full of sound & fury, yet signifying nothing. All he's really done is send the military over to Afghanistan, and they're not even being that effective considering that we've been bombing for a couple weeks now and all we've succeeded in doing is blowing up sand. We still haven't caught Bin Laden. The Taliban are still firmly entrenched over there. And despite this, Moron's approval rating is through the roof. So how come a guy who has the chutzpah to stand up and say, "Hey, our company has a problem and here's a path we can take to try to keep ourselves afloat" -- how come he's the one who gets canned?
The irony of the situation is that this new guy, Creighton, said basically the same thing as Goodwin did when he announced that he would attempt to "sort out" United's financial problems. Apparently, though, he said it with a little more sugar-coating, so that's okay. But I'd rather have a guy stand up and rain fire & brimstone, because sometimes that's the only way to galvanize people and to make them realize that everything's not all right. If you sugar-coat things too much, people will get a false sense of security, which makes things worse for them when the bottom falls out a few months or years down the road.
Posted by Keith @ 06:10 PM ·
United Airlines (who I refuse to fly anymore because every time I fly United, they either delay my flight a long while or route me through Chicago even when I'm not going anywhere near it) canned their chairman, James Goodwin, because he said last week that the company would "perish sometime next year" unless they took actions to cut costs. The company's other directors forced him out and replaced him with board member John Creighton.
Okay, can we take a look at how dumb that was? The man gave a warning -- he said, "Unless we cut costs, we're not going to make it." And they canned him for it. Personally, I think that was a really wise thing to say because it showed that he recognizes the problems facing the company. That's the kind of leadership that I'm looking for in the White House. Recognition is the first step towards solving the problem. Shooting the messenger is the first step towards burying your head in the sand.
The thing that I don't get is that George W. Moron hasn't really done anything since the 9/11 attacks. He's made all sorts of vague statements about how we need to "stand firm and united" and "not give in," but if you break it down to the nitty-gritty, he's really made no definitive points at all. He's the idiot full of sound & fury, yet signifying nothing. All he's really done is send the military over to Afghanistan, and they're not even being that effective considering that we've been bombing for a couple weeks now and all we've succeeded in doing is blowing up sand. We still haven't caught Bin Laden. The Taliban are still firmly entrenched over there. And despite this, Moron's approval rating is through the roof. So how come a guy who has the chutzpah to stand up and say, "Hey, our company has a problem and here's a path we can take to try to keep ourselves afloat" -- how come he's the one who gets canned?
The irony of the situation is that this new guy, Creighton, said basically the same thing as Goodwin did when he announced that he would attempt to "sort out" United's financial problems. Apparently, though, he said it with a little more sugar-coating, so that's okay. But I'd rather have a guy stand up and rain fire & brimstone, because sometimes that's the only way to galvanize people and to make them realize that everything's not all right. If you sugar-coat things too much, people will get a false sense of security, which makes things worse for them when the bottom falls out a few months or years down the road.
Posted by Keith @ 06:10 PM ·
A sample from the latest update: "One month after hijacked planes attacked Lower Manhattan, New York Mayor Rudolph Giuliani spoke out against the epidemic of niceness in the city. He urged New Yorkers to defy the terrorists by resuming normal life... Giuliani said it was time for New Yorkers to get back to being New Yorkers. 'Act like pussies, and the fuckers will have won,' he said."
Posted by Keith @ 06:09 PM ·
A sample from the latest update: "One month after hijacked planes attacked Lower Manhattan, New York Mayor Rudolph Giuliani spoke out against the epidemic of niceness in the city. He urged New Yorkers to defy the terrorists by resuming normal life... Giuliani said it was time for New Yorkers to get back to being New Yorkers. 'Act like pussies, and the fuckers will have won,' he said."
Posted by Keith @ 06:09 PM ·
Sunday, October 28, 2001
It's evening, you're tired
You sleepwalk --
A robot out on the street
Are you crazy to want this, even for a while?
-- Matthew Good Band, "Strange Days"
Posted by Keith @ 06:07 PM ·
It's evening, you're tired
You sleepwalk --
A robot out on the street
Are you crazy to want this, even for a while?
-- Matthew Good Band, "Strange Days"
Posted by Keith @ 06:07 PM ·
Posted by Keith @ 06:04 PM ·
Posted by Keith @ 06:04 PM ·
Posted by Keith @ 06:04 PM ·
Posted by Keith @ 06:04 PM ·
Now, mind you, this is the first person to be arrested in connection with the U.S.S. Cole bombing, which took place a year ago. That's right -- it took a year to catch up to someone for this attack. And while Osama Bin Laden might've been mentioned in connection with the Cole, his name wasn't hammered into our consciousness like it is now. But the thing is, why did it take an entire year to arrest someone in connection with a bombing that destroyed American property and killed American citizens (citizens serving our country, no less!) while within two days of the World Trade Center attacks, we had a name of the prime suspect and within a few weeks, we had a full-scale military response underway?
The Cole was an actual terrorist attack against our country, yet the public response and outrage for that fizzled out very quickly. Maybe because it didn't happen on U.S. soil, maybe because it wasn't against civilians, maybe because it didn't kill on the magnitude of the 9/11 attacks, maybe because it didn't destroy U.S. landmarks. But either way, an attack was made against our country when they attacked the Cole, yet I find it hard to accept the fact that no one had any distinct leads until a year later and people began linking it to the 9/11 attacks.
Posted by Keith @ 06:03 PM ·
Now, mind you, this is the first person to be arrested in connection with the U.S.S. Cole bombing, which took place a year ago. That's right -- it took a year to catch up to someone for this attack. And while Osama Bin Laden might've been mentioned in connection with the Cole, his name wasn't hammered into our consciousness like it is now. But the thing is, why did it take an entire year to arrest someone in connection with a bombing that destroyed American property and killed American citizens (citizens serving our country, no less!) while within two days of the World Trade Center attacks, we had a name of the prime suspect and within a few weeks, we had a full-scale military response underway?
The Cole was an actual terrorist attack against our country, yet the public response and outrage for that fizzled out very quickly. Maybe because it didn't happen on U.S. soil, maybe because it wasn't against civilians, maybe because it didn't kill on the magnitude of the 9/11 attacks, maybe because it didn't destroy U.S. landmarks. But either way, an attack was made against our country when they attacked the Cole, yet I find it hard to accept the fact that no one had any distinct leads until a year later and people began linking it to the 9/11 attacks.
Posted by Keith @ 06:03 PM ·